The Urban "Freedom"
- Emanuele Meloni
- May 28, 2020
- 4 min read
Updated: Jun 1, 2020
In popular language the term "stoic" is to identify a person who courageously bears suffering and hardship, and who shows exemplary fortitude in the face of misfortune and fate.This term derives from one of the most important philosophical spiritual currents of Ancient Greece: Stoicism.

Stoicism was founded by Zeno of Cytius, who insinuated in the minds of his interlocutors the idea that the attainment of moral and intellectual freedom was helped by detachment from material things, and that the perfect peace of the soul arises from the liberation of vices, of the passions, of the necessities, against which man fights every day. An almost utopian doctrine, if you try to apply it to the model of our society, which stands on the unavoidability of work, production, consumption, and in which we always find a hierarchical scale in which someone must always, necessarily submit to someone else.
Within his boundless literary production, Cicero, whose formation was deeply nourished by the Stoic school, proposed the subject from a conflictual point of view within the civil sphere, stating that "Freedom does not consist in having a good master, but in not having one at all" (De re publica, book II). Only with this premise is it possible to dedicate one’s time to the attainment of the moral freedom professed by Zeno.

One of his contemporaries, as well as fellow senator in the last years of Republican Rome, Marco Bruto, was among the main organizers and executors of the assassination of Julius Caesar, while the latter was increasing its dictatorial power and the hope of a restoration of the Res publica was weakened: according to Brutus "it is better not to command anyone than to serve someone, because without command it is allowed to live honestly, in servitude there is no possibility of living". How, then, would it ever be possible to pursue these virtues for a person whose thread of destiny has reserved its closure within a context in which there are laws restricting his freedom? Where one’s existence is confined to the borders of an ordered and hierarchical state, whether it be democracy, oligarchy or dictatorship?

One of the most frequent consequences for those who "can’t" is delinquency, circumvention of the rules. Where an individual is unable to pay taxes but is forced to be part of the welfare state, here he begins to devote himself to theft, corruption, mischief, tax evasion.The latter, for example, still deeply rooted in the Italian social fabric, is not only the result of laws that are not very restrictive, but is a phenomenon that has its roots in the time when the peninsula was fragmented into duchies, marquisates, counties and small or large kingdoms, often led by foreign authorities. Avoiding the payment of taxes was the way to communicate to the upper social strata not to recognize the foreign invader.An attitude so widespread throughout the centuries that it still does not seem to disappear, and the Italian State has in turn converted, like its predecessors, into a "thief’s state".

Comments